Employment Equity Amendment Act can probably be ignored, say Sakeliga

The new regulations are extreme and unenforceable, say legal experts. The organisation advises employers to sign up to strong employers organisations

Robert Duigan

By 

Robert Duigan

Published 

December 5, 2024

Employment Equity Amendment Act can probably be ignored, say Sakeliga

Come January 2025, South African employers face the official rollout of the Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEAA), which mandates that workplaces mirror the country's demographic composition. Yet, the state’s capacity to enforce these quotas appears far from robust. Business leaders, therefore, find themselves in a strong position to resist implementation.

The challenges confronting the EEAA are threefold. First, legal battles spearheaded by organizations like Sakeliga loom large, aiming to dismantle or delay the legislation. Second, the Department of Labour, hamstrung by limited resources, lacks the reach to police compliance across the vast business landscape effectively. Third, the impracticality—and perceived injustice—of rigid demographic quotas makes widespread defiance likely, with many firms feeling morally justified in their non-compliance.

Sakeliga urges employers to stand their ground, refraining from altering hiring policies solely to align with the EEAA. The recommendation? Engage in strategic non-cooperation until either the act is overturned or its enforcement proves infeasible. Sakeliga also advises all employers to join the National Employers’ Association of South Africa (NEASA), the business representation group run by Gerhard Papenfus.

The EEAA’s racially prescriptive framework also poses challenges beyond South Africa’s borders. Multinational companies, wary of legal risks in their home countries, may balk at compliance. Foreign legislation often prohibits adherence to race-based employment laws, raising potential conflicts that could deter investment.

Employers facing penalties, or those bound by foreign regulations, are encouraged to share their experiences with Sakeliga, contributing to a legal arsenal against the EEAA. Particularly valuable are cases involving punitive measures for non-compliance, or firms struggling with the act’s demands due to ethical, operational, or jurisdictional constraints.

The battle lines are drawn: as the state pushes for demographic parity in every workplace, South Africa’s business community appears poised to push back.

more articles by this author