President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to deploy 2,900 South African National Defence Force (SANDF) members to the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has sparked controversy and concern. The move, described as reckless and irrational by critics, has raised questions about the safety and strategic reasoning behind such a deployment.

The DA has also slammed the decision to get involved, emphasising the lack of preparedness and the steep costs.

Aside from the technical questions, this is not a peacekeeping mission like the UN forces we served under in the recent past, but a partisan conflict between the DRC and its SADC allies and Rwandan proxies in the Kivu provinces, with genocidal Hutu Power militia supported by the DRC. Escalation is likely.

You can read more on the different aspects of this dangerous conflict and the investments at stake here.

One of the primary criticisms is the lack of transparency and consultation regarding the decision. Parliament was not adequately informed, and military experts' warnings were reportedly disregarded. This lack of clarity has led to speculation about the true motivations behind the deployment and whether it serves South Africa's national security interests.

The SANDF's capacity to effectively carry out this mission has also come under scrutiny. With a shortage of crucial equipment and limited air support, the troops are deemed vulnerable in the complex and hostile terrain of the DRC. Concerns have been raised about the potential for the M23 rebels, familiar with the territory, to launch tactical ambushes on the SANDF forces.

1. Rooivalk Attack Helicopters: The SANDF does not have Rooivalk helicopters available for the DRC deployment. These helicopters are crucial for providing top cover and support to ground forces in combat situations.
2. Oryx Transport Helicopters: Only five Oryx helicopters are currently in the DRC, and it is expected that this number will be reduced to two during the course of the deployment. This limits the SANDF's ability to transport troops and supplies, as well as provide air support in the region.
3. Mamba Armoured Personnel Carriers: Only five Mamba armoured personnel carriers have been deployed to the DRC. These vehicles are used for transporting troops in hostile environments and providing them with protection against small arms fire and explosive devices.
4. Land Cruisers: Only two Land Cruisers have been deployed to the DRC. These vehicles are likely used for logistical support and transport in the region.
5. Mfezi Armoured Ambulance: Just one Mfezi armoured ambulance has been deployed to the DRC. This vehicle is crucial for providing medical support and evacuating injured personnel in combat situations.

Critics argue that the deployment diverts resources away from addressing pressing domestic issues, such as upgrading the SANDF's equipment and improving logistical capabilities. The estimated cost of over R2 billion has also raised eyebrows, with many questioning the allocation of such funds to a mission of questionable strategic value.

Despite these criticisms, the deployment is said to be in line with South Africa's commitment to the Southern African Development Community (SADC) peacekeeping mission in the DRC. However, critics argue that South Africa should prioritize its own security needs and only deploy troops when there is a clear and immediate threat to national security.

In conclusion, President Ramaphosa's decision to deploy troops to the DRC has been met with criticism and concern. Questions about the strategic reasoning behind the deployment, as well as the safety and effectiveness of the mission, remain unanswered. The controversy highlights the need for greater transparency and consultation in matters of national security and foreign policy.

‍